I RESIST BY TELLING MY STORY MANUAL

Further, no social media policies and procedures or any policies and procedures regarding disclosures of PHI were provided. did not remove the PHI from its Google page, and the response remains public as of the date of this Notice. On April 14, 2017, in its response, provided an Acknowledgment of Training, which did not contain any documents about the contents of the training (e.g., PowerPoint slides).

The practice had been “warned” eight months earlier on the roadmap to avoiding further trouble. OCR requested the practice’s policies and procedures regarding disclosures of PHI on social media and the removal of the practice’s response to the negative review on its Google page. Further, OCR also informed the practice that it should, if it did not currently have such, develop policies and procedures related to the disclosures of PHI and more specifically with regard to disclosures of PHI on social media. OCR informed the practice that its response to the negative review constituted an impermissible disclosure of Protected Health Information (PHI), and the practice should remove its response promptly. The practice delivered the requested Notice of Privacy Practices, but “no policies and procedures or documentation of training was provided.” Within a week, the practice confessed it did respond to the online negative review. Documentation of any HIPAA training conducted prior to, and in response to, the incident described in the complaint.A copy of the practice’s policies and procedures with respect to safeguarding PHI and.A copy of policies and procedures with respect to uses and disclosures of Protected Health Information (PHI).A copy of the practice’s policies and procedures with respect to responding to patients’ reviews on online platforms.On November 15, 2015, the former patient filed a complaint with the Office of Civil Rights (OCR). Making derogatory statements will not enhance your reputation in this era.

I RESIST BY TELLING MY STORY MANUAL

From the foregoing, it’s obvious that level of intelligence is in question and he should continue with his manual work and not expose himself to ridicule. I never performed any procedure on this disgruntled patient other than oral examinations. He never came back for his scheduled appointment Does he deserve any rating as a patient? Not even one star. When people want to express their ignorance, you don’t have to do anything, just let them talk. Is that a bad experience? Only from someone hallucinating. He was given a second referral for a root canal treatment to be performed by my endodontist colleague. He last came to my office on March 2014 as an emergency patient due to excruciating pain he was experiencing from the lower left quadrant.

He never came for his scheduled appointments as his treatment plans submitted to his insurance company were approved. “It’s so fascinating to see make unsubstantiated accusations when he only came to my practice on two occasions since October 2013. Around September 28, 2015, the practice responded, disclosing the patient’s real name, unmasking the alias: Around September 28, 2015, the patient posted a negative online review on Google, using a partial alias. In October 2013 and March 2014, a patient visited the practice for treatment. Phillip Igbinadolor runs a dental practice in North Carolina.

I resist by telling my story